The Cross And The Seat Belt

If you think like an Atheist -- live like and Atheist -- and believe in the cultural tenets of Atheism -- can you also be a Christian?  The answer to this question has in fact put the Church on trial in a court in Graham, North Carolina.   What on the surface may appear to be little more than a violation of the seat belt law, those familiar with the essence of the matter understand that the case has brought into question the very source and originality of Church doctrine and dogma.   Is the Church truly representative of the Original teachings of Jesus and TheWay?  Or is it more factually the religion of Mithraism masquerading under a biblical cloak that in practice, it rejects every part of?   While it is truly rare that a legal challenge to the validity of the Church can be brought about in the United States, this challenge is only possible because the state has far exceeded its true Constitutional boundaries.  Provoking the question: Is this legal challenge truly about a religious opposition to what the plaintiff's Allan Cronshaw and Emmanuel  Pohoreski  state is a violation of the First Amendment protections of the freedom of the practice of religion?   Or is it a means to put the Church on trial for heresy in the adoption of fourth century Roman paganism?   Perhaps it is both.  But defendant Allan Cronshaw expects to take this case up to the Supreme Court where both the dogmatic Church as well as secular apostasy to the Constitution can be put on trial in the Highest Court of the Land.   Therefore, each seeming loss on appeal, is only one step closer to the eventual goal of the Spiritual Rebirth of the Nation in accord with the original vision of our Constitutional Framers (see American Spirituality)!

As the leader of the Ebionite Spiritual Restoration Movement, plaintiff Allan Cronshaw has provided a web page (see The Cross and the Seat Belt) -- and throughout this article it is demonstrated conclusively that the Church is a modern fraud that in practice, totally rejects the Gospels and New Testament (see The Lie) -- and under the cloak of wolves in sheep's attire, promotes Roman paganism in place of the Original Spiritual Gospel Message (see Govt. Takeover Of Religion) to a blind faith-believing congregation who prefers dogmatic snake-oil to the Truth and the Original teachings of Jesus and TheWay.   As Mr. Cronshaw has pointed out, this should come as no surprise when it is recognized that the Apostle Paul predicted that the Church which calls itself Christian, would replace the worship of God with the worship of Satan (see The Church Of The AntiChrist) -- and that the time has finally arrived where the Church itself can be put on trial and confronted with its long history of spiritual apostasy and opposition to both the original teachings of Jesus and TheWay, as well as the Kingdom of God (see Apostate Church).   In fact, Allan Cronshaw not only claims to be a type of reincarnation of the person known as James, the brother of Jesus (see Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus) -- but also claims to be an eye witness to the death and destruction of the original Spiritual Christians when they were hunted down by the emperors henchmen for refusing to accept the religion of the emperor (see The Death Of The Religion Of Jesus).   And he has portrayed himself as having been sent back into this world on a mission to tell the people the Truth, and to bring about the conviction and the downfall of the infidel -- and in this instance, both Church and State who have each violated the essence of their own First Principles -- principles that have brought their validity into question.

Defendants Allan Cronshaw and Emmanuel Pohoreski state that the existing seat belt law is based upon an Atheist Paradigm of thinking (see Darwinism & Secular Humanism), and from both a biblical and spiritual perspective, is a bogus fraud the entraps the people into a spiritually impotent mindset and lifestyle (see The Great Canard Of Atheism And Evolutionists).   And rather then denying God and what they have set forth as Higher Spiritual Reality in the manner of the Church which the defendants have portrayed as a type of western equivalent of a House Church in Communist China where no deviation from government approved dogma is permitted, the defendants have instead taken a stand against what they portray as an unconstitutional statute, and in the process have brought the validity of both Church and State into question.   While it would be legally impossible to initiate a cause of action that would put the Church on trial for heresy, the unconstitutional actions of the state of North Carolina has enabled the defendants to put the foundational dogma of the Church on trial.

Under the heading of The Great Question Presented To The Court, is presented the meaning of Religious Freedom as defined in Black's Law Dictionary where it states: "Within Constitution embraces not only the right to worship GOD according to the dictates of one's conscience, but also the right to do, or forbearing of which is not inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society."   So, from a Constitutional perspective, the ONLY question set before the court must be limited to whether the defendants refusal to wear a seat belt is “inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society”, and whether the practice of the defendants religion which rejects the competing religion of Secular-Humanism -- a quasi-religious manner of thinking which is founded upon a mindset and Atheist philosophy that rejects the Biblical teaching on Divine Providence, and therefore requires the wearing of a seatbelt -- will bring harm to a person in another car in the event of a collision.  While there is not a single case on record where the drivers failure to wear a seat belt has brought harm to another driver or pedestrian, the Court has chosen to turn a blind eye to the failure of the law to provide a necessary religious exemption -- even though in North Carolina, other exemptions are provided (see Exemptions To Seat Belt Law) -- including an exemption to those who have a phobia about wearing a seat belt.   And when it is demonstrated that even young children are exempt from the seat belt law when riding in a pickup truck, either the sanity or ideological objectives of the court must be brought into question. 

What is the rulings of the Supreme Court on this issue?  Chief Justice Burger admonished:  "Courts should not undertake to dissect religious beliefs... One can, of course, imagine an asserted claim so bazaar so clearly non-religious in motivation, as not to be entitled to protection under the free exercise clause: but that is not the case here, and the guarantee of free exercise is not limited to beliefs which are shared by all members of a religious sect. The courts are not arbiters of scriptural interpretation…. The essence of law that has been set and written on the subject is that only those interests of the highest order... can overbalance legitimate claims to the free exercise of religion” (Thomas vs Review Board 450 US 707, 718 (1981) accord, Wisconsin vs. Yoder, 406 US 205, 215 [1972]; Sherbert vs Verner, 374 US 393, 406 [1963]).  The Court has ruled that “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as Legal Principles to be applied by the courts” (West Virginia State Board of Education vs Burnette 319 US 624, 638, [1943]).

Will the court of North Carolina follow the very clear mandates of the Constitution and established rulings of the Supreme Court which all support the position of the defendants?   A very simple legal question has been presented before the Court on the defendants web site and legal motions (see The Cross and the Seat Belt).  But without any justification as to why the defendants practice of religion should be denied, the Alamance County Court has ruled against the First Amendment protection of the practice of religion.   And this in effect has enabled the defendants to put both Church and State on trial -- the Church for spiritual heresy and a total rejection of the Original Gospel Teachings -- and the State as apostates to the Constitution and the validity of its rulings.  

It has been demonstrated by the defendants that the dogma of the present day Church has virtually nothing in common with the religion of Jesus that was inaugurated at the beginning of our Common Era (see The Heightening And Expansion Of Mind).   It has also been demonstrated that the wearing of a seat belt is very much a denial of the Truth and the Facts as proven by both science and genuine Christian Mysticism (see What's Wrong With Wearing A Seat Belt?).   And when a person chooses to knowingly live a lie in abject defiance of the Truth, then their spiritual progress and development is gravely inhibited.   Further, the position of Einstein that there are two separate spheres of mind -- the one he portrays as the "intuitive gift", and the other as the "linear-rational faithful servant" -- and demonstrates that because our culture suppresses the intuitive, that man has consigned himself into the abyss of ignorance with respect to man's true reality and potential (see Intuitive Mind vs Linear-Rational).    Defendants reject the cultural assumption that the events in this life are subject to luck, chance or accidents, and demonstrate the reality of the biblical doctrine of Divine Providence in all things.   And in the process the defendants provide an answer for the proverbial question that has perpetually haunted most religious people in the explanation as to Why Does Bad Things Happen To Seemingly Good People.  Which begins with an understanding of the Conditions Of One's Birth - Life - And Death.   And it is further demonstrated that because the congregation of faith-based believers live and think in accord with the Paradigm of Thought established by Atheism, that the Church has been spiritually castrated and rendered impotent.   Therefore, rather than live a lie and deny the Truth, the defendants have instead chosen to invoke their First Amendment protection of their sincerely held practice of religion.

The appeal of the previous ruling of Judge James K. Roberson is set for a hearing on December 5th in the Alamance County Superior Court.   Defendant Allan Cronshaw states that the case was orchestrated by the Laws of God in order to put the validity of both the Church, and the State on trial for the respective heresy and apostasy to their Core Foundations.    In fact, what is being put on trial is very much the Truth, Justice and the American Way.   In the manner of true infidels, the Church is poised against the Original Teachings of Jesus -- while the State has thus far attempted to rule the Constitution as being invalid.   The defendants take the position that a loss in Court, will effect a positive response from the Angelic Jury that has been called to preside over the future of both Church and State based upon their responses.

Jesus And The Political/Religious Environment Of Truth

Most religious people look for a Messiah who will come and confirm the validity of their religious beliefs, and set up a New World Order where mankind will live in peace.   The Jews expect a Messiah who will confirm them as the Chosen People -- the Christians expect Jesus -- Islam expects a Muslim Messiah who will kill all the Christians and Jews who fail to convert to the worship of Allah.   And what all these Messianic visions have in common, is the fact that they all ignore the paradigm set forth in the parable of the prodigal son -- i.e., that the son must of his own accord return to the Kingdom from which he originally emerged.   And what this means is that (1) this world serves an important purpose in the spiritual evolution of the lost prodigal son; (2) that a true Messiah will come and teach those who have the ears to hear, how to make the return journey in TheWay back to the Kingdom.   

From the perspective of the True Messiah who is rejected by the religions and authorities of this world, such a soul understands that the environment is everything -- i.e., the environment of the body -- the environment of the family -- the environment of the community of believers.   Paul commanded the community of believers not to even sit at the table and have dinner with sinners and the spiritually unclean (see The Folly Of Social Justice).   Quoting the article The Perfect Seed in the parable of the Sower and the Seed: What the parable of the sower dispels is the notion of most Messianic and Christian faith-based believers that it does not matter how we live, once we have received the Word of God in the form of the Gospel message.  This misconception can be compared to a man who desires to plant a vineyard, and having procured the finest seedlings ever developed, attempts to plant these seedlings in a desert.   Regardless of the fact that we possess the most perfect seedlings ever known to man, when we live our lives in the manner of a spiritually barren wasteland, the vineyard that we envision can never manifest and become a reality. In our quest to demonstrate this fact we must ask what the Bible states: In the parable of the sower (Mt 13:1-58; Mk 4:1-20; Lk 8:4-56), Jesus taught that the Word could only be fruitful when it was planted in the proper environment.   The Word that fell upon the ground at the side of The Way, could not become fruitful because Satan takes away what was sown.  And if we pose the question as to where was the seed sown?  The scriptures states "...the word that was sown in their hearts" (Mark 4:15 KJV) -- thus we can see that Satan has the power to alienate us from our own true inner spiritual reality.

   

Not only is the environment of the body-vessel of the utmost importance, but the first objectives of the disciples in the Book of Acts was to set up the proper environment in the Communities in which the seekers would dwell.   With respect to this necessary environment in our own time, the opening of the American Spirituality segment now reads: By Divine Design, the Laws moved the hearts and minds of men in the creation of the United States which has brought about and manifest what is often portrayed as Exceptionalism in the world today.  And the Spiritual Foundation and Roots of the Nation was brought forth by our Constitutional Framers -- a group of souls that are perhaps best portrayed as The American Gnostics.    Our Nation was conceived in Spirit, and born from the wisdom and efforts of truly advanced spiritual souls who entered the world in the 18^th century to create a foundational environment that would permit mankind to aspire to his highest potential in all things -- and especially in the development and manifestation of his latent spirituality.   Thus, this core group of our Constitutional Framers who I portray as American Gnostics, were drawn from the upper echelons of all religious paths -- and especially Christianity which "...they considered true, original Christianity to be the same as this original natural religion" which they embraced -- and they were for the most part called Deists, because of their enlightened understanding of the Laws.   The Encyclopedia defines Deism as: "Deism holds that God does not intervene with the functioning of the natural world in any way, allowing it to run according to the laws of nature that he configured when he created all things. ...Prior to the 17th century the terms ['Deism' and 'Deist'] were used interchangeably with the terms 'theism' and 'theist,' respectively.  ...Both [theists and Deists] asserted belief in one supreme God, the Creator... and agreed that God is personal and distinct from the world. But the theist taught that God remained actively interested in and operative in the world which he had made, whereas the Deist maintained that God endowed the world at creation with self-sustaining and self-acting powers and then abandoned it to the operation of these powers acting as second causes."   

When rightfully understood, what the founding American Gnostics (Deists) understood that the theists did not, is the reality that the Laws of God that were brought into existence and being at Creation, supported and sustained all realities of this world -- that these Laws were never suspended in order to provide one group of men an advantage or special dispensation over other groups of men.   What this means is that the Laws of God are predictable, rational, logical, and are totally uniform in their application in the lives of all of mankind.   Moreover, because these Laws in their higher purpose respond to man's thoughts, desires and actions, they exist in the manner of a Living Bio-Feedback machine that brought about the higher spiritual objectives with which God imbued all of Creation with in the beginning.   What this means is that no one is exempt from the Laws and the Will of God -- no one has an unfair advantage over their brothers and sisters -- that all of mankind has a common destiny that is controlled, orchestrated and brought about by the Laws -- and that there is a higher purpose for all things than what man can envision in his unenlightened state of mind. 

While Christianity should be the environment of spiritual rebirth that enables both Judaism and Islam to rediscover their true spiritual roots, the Paganism infused in the dogma of the Church in the fourth century has inhibited this destiny (see Government Intrusion And Takeover Of Religion).   And it has become virtually impossible for the faith-based Christian believer to understand the great truths that have been presented in the parables, because of the condemnation of important original teachings that were declared heresy by the Roman Emperors who ruled the Church (see The Spiritual Castration Of The Church - The Removal Of The Teachings On The Preexistent Soul).   If it is true that the lost prodigal son at one time dwelt in the Kingdom, and does not remember because he dwells in the "outer darkness" under the control of the Citizen of the Far Country -- and to overcome his own spiritual amnesia and begin to remember his more distant past, he must follow in the footsteps of Jesus by picking up his own cross and travailing in TheWay -- then it can be understood how the modern spiritually disenfranchised Church is throwing away the necessary Constitutional Foundation that was provided by the blood of our forefathers, in the quest to bring about Christian Marxism (see The Folly Of Social Justice).  And while even Pres. Obama has preached his Socialist gospel of Collective Salvation, the only salvation portrayed in the Gospel accounts is when the individual believer/disciple as represented in the lost prodigal son returns to the Kingdom of his own volition.

What is the Truth?   If it is true that both the Gospel teachings and the scriptures were corrupted by Pagan Rome (see The Corruption Of The Church), then the question that each and every Christian must ask: How do I prove what is the Truth?   That is easy -- i.e., create the proper spiritually clean and consecrated environment within your body/mind, your family and community.

Brother of Yeshua

Is Mormonism A Cult? Or Is One Cult Condemning Another Cult?

Government Intervention In Religion: The Cross And The Seatbelt

Pastor Robert Jeffress who spoke out in favor of Gov. Rick Perry and opposed Mitt Romney on the grounds that Mormonism is a cult, pointed out the difference between what he portrayed as a sociological cult, from a theological cult see Fox & Friends Interview), in his statement that: "Mormonism was invented 1800 years after Jesus Christ and the founding of Christianity, and it has its own founder, Joseph Smith, its own set of doctrines and its own book, the Book of Mormon. And that, by definition, is a theological cult, that's all I'm saying."  In an interview on CNN (see CNN), the Rev. Jeffress explained: "When somebody asks me a theological question about Mormonism, I have a responsibility to tell the truth," he said. "Mormonism has never been considered a part of evangelical historic Christianity."   And when these words of the Rev. Jeffress are properly understood, what we have is an older Theological Cult throwing stones as a newer Theological Cult -- and the chickens coming home to roost on the reality that, those who live in glass houses, shouldn't throw stones. 

With respect to the statement: "When somebody asks me a theological question ...I have a responsibility to tell the truth" -- not only is the mainstream of Christianity founded upon a "...set of doctrines" that is a total departure from the original teachings of Jesus and TheWay -- but when it is recognized that the 4^th century Church edited and rewrote the scriptures to the degree that the Roman Christian Cult has "...its own book", that is vastly different than the original scriptures that were in use prior to the 4^th century -- and while this fact can easily be proven, then it must be concluded that Pastor Jeffress and the whole of the Christian world remains in denial of the facts!!!   Yet, like the pot that calls the kettle black, they deceptively throw stones as Mormonism which is the religion of Mitt Romney.

Prior to the Nicene take over of the Church by the Pagan Emperor Constantine in the 4^th century, the wisest and most intelligent of enlightened men and women were the Christians who possessed the Spiritual Knowledge that provided them a higher understanding of the Laws and the realities of this world that continues to remain virtually unknown even in modern times.   And, what is not at all realized, is the fact that the Core of the Spiritual Christians possessed far greater knowledge than any of the pseudo-scholars who teach in our universities today.   What happened?   There was a segment of the Church that had become paganized and morally bankrupt (see The Example Of Paul Of Samosata ), and these very pagan Christians entered into a covenant with the Emperor Constantine, and the Church became proscribed by pagan Rome.   The result was that (1) the emperor who ruled over the Church, dictated the acceptable doctrines of belief; (2) the Spiritual Christians were denounced and condemned as heretics who were hunted down and murdered; (3) the most corrupted copies of the scriptures (see Bible Corruption) were further rewritten in order to make them support the dogma of pagan Rome; (4) and the higher spiritual knowledge that the Church previously possessed, became outlawed as heresy.   Contrary to the modern Bible, the original scriptures supported the original position that Jesus was a man who lived a holy and consecrated life -- and thus, became the Anointed (Messiah/Christ) at his baptism in the Jordan (see The Ten Words).   That the scriptures are themselves an allegory that both preserve and conceal the inner core of teachings that is necessary to gain entrance to the Kingdom Within (see An Inconvenient Truth), is a reality of fact that the modern Church remains in denial of today.    And if the modern Christian is ignorant, then this ignorance is directly attributable to government intervention into the core doctrines of belief which continues to be embraced right into the present time.   Thus, when modern Atheists such as Richard Dawkins portrays the Christian as ignorant, what he is unknowingly condemning is the government doctrines that were imposed upon the Church.   Men such as  Richard Dawkins are not only absolutely clueless as to the nature and reality of the Truth of the pre-Nicene Christian Church, but their Paradigm of Thinking has totally alienated them from man's true higher reality.   

Under the heading of American Spirituality it is demonstrated that our Constitutional Framers who understood what is portrayed as the Laws of Nature and Nature's God (see American Spirituality), where themselves enlightened as to the wholesale corruption which the Church suffered under the control of Pagan Rome.    And thus, their First Amendment prohibition against the government enacting any law that infringes upon the practice of religion, is the result of the spiritual disenfranchisement of the mainstream of the Christianity by the previous governments which exhibited total and complete control over the dogmatic doctrines of the Church -- dogmatic manmade doctrines which are still embraced even today.    More than anything else our Constitutional framers understood human nature -- and that once unleashed, the reigns of government will corrupt and attempt to exercise Absolute Power in direct defiance even to its Constitutional Charter and Mandates -- and this fact is demonstrated conclusively in the issue of the claim of a religious exemption from the seat belt law (see Is North Carolina Constitutionally Immoral?).   And in the same way that the North Carolina Alamance County Court has disallowed the true spiritual practice of religion -- even discarding the very primary tenets of the Constitution (see Court Ruling) -- it is important to be cognizant of the fact that when Christianity became proscribed under Pagan Rome which exercised absolute control over the doctrines of the Church, there was no judicial appeal or higher authority -- and to disagree with the dictates of the emperor, was a sentence of death.          

The Spiritual Core of Christianity remains virtually unknown today, because of direct government intrusion into the affairs of the Church with respect to acceptable doctrines of belief.   In the same way that in China only those Churches which are approved by the government are permitted, so too was the Church that came into being in the fourth century under the direct control of the Roman Emperors.   That the segment of the Church which called itself Orthodox, was a mere puppet of Pagan Rome and had little to nothing in common with the original teachings and objectives of Jesus and TheWay, should come as no surprise to the modern believer in view of the many statements of biblical scholars such as A. Powell Davies who attempted to warn the Christian world that discoveries such as the Dead Sea Scrolls had confirmed what they had suspected and believed all along -- i.e., that the Emperor Constantine and the Pagan Church of Rome created a religion of blind faith and belief where he wrote that: “Biblical scholars were not disturbed by what they found in the Dead Sea Scrolls because they had known all along that the origin of Christianity was not what was commonly supposed to have been” (quoted by Millar Burrows in More Light on the Dead Sea Scrolls).   Thus, this long ignored statement prompts us to ask: Why didn't the biblical scholars understand the true origin of Christianity prior to the discovery and examination of the Dead Sea Scrolls?   To answer this question we must consult the findings of Prof. Elaine Pagles who correctly writes: “It is the winners who write history - their way. No wonder, then, that the viewpoint of the successful majority has dominated all traditional accounts of the origin of Christianity… It suggests that these religious debates - questions of the nature of God, or of Christ - simultaneously bear social and political implications that are crucial to the development of Christianity as an institutional religion. In simplest terms, ideas which bear implications contrary to that development come to be labeled as heresy; ideas which implicitly support it become orthodox” (see Pagles, The Gnostic Gospels).    In not learning the lessons of history, modern believers have overlooked the fact that when despots rule, they not only annihilate all opposition -- but they "...write history - their way" -- and they corrupt and burn whatever writings stand in opposition to their supremacy and rule.   Which means that those doctrines of belief that are today seen as orthodox and promoted by the modern-day Church as being authentic, are themselves drawn from the side of "...political implications that [were] crucial to the development of Christianity as an institutional religion" under the direct control of Pagan Rome.   In the case of the Christian Church beginning in the fourth century, to disagree with the doctrines affirmed by the Emperor Constantine, carried with it the sentence of death.   Thus, Edward Gibbon writes in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: ”Constantine easily believed that the heretics, who presumed to dispute his opinions or to oppose his commands, were guilty of the most absurd and criminal obstinacy... Not a moment was lost in excluding the ministers and teachers of the separated congregations from any share of the rewards and immunities which the emperor had so liberally bestowed on the orthodox clergy. But as the sectaries might still exist under the cloud of royal disgrace, the conquest of the East was immediately followed by an edict which announced their total destruction”.    Thus, in the same way that whoever did not embrace the religion of the emperor met with the sentence of death, whatever scriptures did not conform to the approved version, was immediately destroyed (see http://BibleCorruption.com ).  

The term BC with respect to the beginning of our Common Era, should be reevaluated to indicate Before Constantine with respect to the birth of the Christ that is worshiped in the modern Church and promoted by its secularized (Orthodox) dogma.   That the modern-day Christ and the religion of the Church were conceived and born under the dominion of the Roman Emperor Constantine -- and that the dogma of the Church was purely political, in contradistinction to the spiritual foundation of the original teachings -- is demonstrated in the fact that modern Christianity has very little in common with the original objectives of the teachings of TheWay which was to bring about "...the heightening and enlargement of human consciousness”  (see Expansion Of Mind) -- which has absolutely nothing in common with the blind faith dogmatized Church that came into being in the fourth century under the rulership and doctrinal control of Pagan Rome.   But the fact that the modern Christians worship the satanic god of Constantine should come as no surprise, in view of the fact that the Apostle Paul predicted that the worship of the true God would cease, and those who called themselves Christian would instead worship Satan (see The Church of the AntiChrist).   That the objective of what Paul portrays as the god of this world, is to keep the congregation of Christians ignorant and promoters of blind-faith in the spurious doctrines of Pagan Rome, has for the most part continued to inhibit the True Spiritual ReBirth of the Church.   And while pseudo-priests such as Martin Luther convinced the Church to embrace the dogma of faith apart from actions -- to the degree that every tenet of the modern Church is openly condemned in their own New Testament (see The Lie & The Ten Minute Test), the modern believer continues to ignore the scriptures in their allegiance to the dogma of Pagan Rome.   And, just as equally important to understand, is that "...the heightening and enlargement of human consciousness”  has absolutely nothing to do with the expansion of the physical brain -- but rather, both the refinement of the physical body that permits this expansion of mind to be brought about, and the development of those areas which lie under the control of the innate Intuitive Spheres of the Mind that the physical brain does not naturally support.

Is North Carolina Constitutionally Immoral?

What is Constitutional Immorality?  This is when a Constitutional God-Given Right that by American Jurisprudence is UnAlienable, is dismissed and negated without so much as even a reason provided.  And while Atheists and Marxist Secular Progressives routinely extend their middle index finger upward at God in their attempt to undermine the American Spirituality that formed the foundational bed-rock of God-Given UnAlienable Rights based upon the Laws of Nature and Nature's God (see American Spirituality), when the actions of a state which is sworn to uphold the Constitution in the name of representing the Will of the People, parallel that of the Atheists, then truly we have a tyrannical American abomination that can only be portrayed as Constitutional Immorality!  The Atheist agenda is to incrementally undermine the people's individual rights -- removing even the mention of God and Constitutional Rights from the American cultural arena -- in order to inaugurate a European type socialist state.   While this has been largely accomplished in states such as New York and California, the South is the next target.  Thus, if the South Rises Again, it will be to save the Nation from the Atheist folly that strives to undermine the whole of our Constitutional form of government.  

Black's Law Dictionary defines Religious Freedom as: "Within  Constitution embraces  not only the right to worship GOD according to the dictates of one's conscience, but  also the right to do, or  forbearing of which is not inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society."  And with respect to these organic Constitutional Rights of Man, the Court has ruled that “The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as Legal Principles to be applied by the courts” (West Virginia State Board of Education vs Burnette 319  US 624, 638, [1943]).  As an Atheistic symbol of the paradigm of thought which rejects the biblical doctrine of Divine Providence -- which symbol is in direct conflict with everything that I know to be true -- unless it can be demonstrated that my religious objection to wearing a seatbelt is “inimical to the peace, good order, and morals of society”, then the state is Constitutionally duty-bound to provide me with a religious exemption from the law.   And this is especially true when it is realized that the law already provides exemptions to  “Persons with a certified phobia of seat belts; Persons tending to a child's personal needs; Situations where all seating positions equipped with seat belts are occupied.”  Further, the state of North Carolina even permits people not only to ride in the open bed of a pick-up truck, but also permits children under the age of twelve “If an adult is present in the bed or cargo area of the vehicle and is supervising the child”.   An Internet search on children riding in the back of a pickup truck provides factual statistics of alarm.   Quoting one article: “Any pickup passenger is better protected when riding in the cab of the truck than when riding in the bed” ( Read more: Child Safety in Pickup Trucks | eHow.com  ).   Which means that if there existed any consistency in the laws, a child in an open bed would be required to wear an approved motorcycle helmet.  Again, none of these exemptions to the existing law have a claim of a higher order than that of First Amendment Protection which the court has chosen to ignore without so much as providing even an explanation -- i.e., for an American, a blatant violation of fundamental principles that can only be portrayed as being Constitutionally Immoral.   

What is a Paradigm of Thought?  As I use the term above?  Its like the fruit of a mindset or school of thinking.  Not only does the Atheist and Secular Humanism and Progressive mindset reject God -- but there exists a whole philosophical school of thought that provides the Atheistic mindset an environment to spawn and manifest.  And in the case of the seatbelt, the Atheist Paradigm of Thought rejects Divine Providence and the biblical doctrine of predestination.   What the Atheist Paradigm of Thought does, is reject the many statements of Jesus.  As an example: When Jesus told the woman to "sin no more, lest a worst thing come upon you", Jesus was making reference to The Laws that react to each person's actions (see The Laws That Perfect Mankind - Cause And Effect).   Because of their own self-imposed ignorance of the Laws, the Atheist Paradigm of Thought maintains that Jesus was in error.    Where the Atheist attributes all events to chance, luck, natural selection or the unknown, the early Church maintained that all events have a preexisting cause -- and that not even a sparrow can fall to the ground, apart from the Will of God.   In the same way that a Swastika is a symbol of Fascist Socialism, the seatbelt is a symbol of the Atheist Paradigm of Thought that rejects the biblical doctrine of Divine Providence. 
   
While on the surface the refusal to wear a seat belt on religious grounds may appear odd, this is because governments have so thoroughly imposed their dogma upon the Church over the course of the last 1700 years, that the majority of believers who call themselves Christians have totally lost sight of what the original teachings and objectives were.   Rather than submit to the emperor, the first Christians chose death in the lions den.   Why?  As a Spiritual Religion, the original teachings had virtually little in common with modern government imposed Church dogma.  Thus, A. Powell Davies warned that the Dead Sea Scrolls had confirmed what biblical scholars had suspected and believed all along -- i.e., that the Emperor Constantine and the Pagan Church of Rome created a religion of blind faith and belief where he wrote that: “Biblical scholars were not disturbed by what they found in the Dead Sea Scrolls because they had known all along that the origin of Christianity was not what was commonly supposed to have been” (quoted by Millar Burrows in More Light on the Dead Sea Scrolls).  And with respect to what the Dead Sea Scrolls revealed that remains ignored by the Church, Prof. John Allegro acknowledged that the facts “...may upset a great many basic teachings of the Christian Church.   This in turn would greatly upset many Christian Theologians and believers.   The heart of the matter is, in fact, the source and originality of Christian doctrine” (August 1966 issue of Harpers Magazine).   And the Adam Clark Bible Commentary stated that if one of the core doctrines imposed upon the Church by 4th century Pagan Rome is not true, that  "...the whole Christian system is vain and baseless" (see The Ten Words).    Which means that the question that is presently being raised in a North Carolina Court, is not only whether the practice of religion is subject to the whims of the state, but also the decrees of the Roman Emperors who forced their edicts upon the Church with the sentence of death.  As detailed at this   American Spirituality link, our (Deist) Constitutional Framers saw Christianity as the highest source of spiritual truth, and the very purpose of the Bill of Rights was to impose restrictions upon government, and created the necessary environment for Spiritual Christianity to again be reborn and established -- fulfilling its potential to lead mankind out of the dark ignorance of this world, and into the Light of True Enlightenment.    

Thus, these long ignored statements prompts us to pose the question: Why didn't the biblical scholars understand the true origin of Christianity prior to the discovery and examination of the Dead Sea Scrolls?   To answer this question we must consult the findings of Prof. Elaine Pagles who correctly writes: “It is the winners who write history - their way. No wonder, then, that the viewpoint of the successful majority has dominated all traditional accounts of the origin of Christianity… It suggests that these religious debates - questions of the nature of God, or of Christ - simultaneously bear social and political implications that are crucial to the development of Christianity as an institutional religion. In simplest terms, ideas which bear implications contrary to that development come to be labeled as heresy; ideas which implicitly support it become orthodox”  (see Pagles, The Gnostic Gospels).    In not learning the lessons of history, modern believers have overlooked the fact that when despots rule, they not only annihilate all opposition -- but they "...write history - their way" -- and they corrupt and burn whatever writings stand in opposition to their supremacy and rule. Which means that those doctrines of belief that are seen as orthodox and promoted by the modern-day Church today, is drawn from the side of "...political implications that [were] crucial to the development of Christianity as an institutional religion" under the direct control of Pagan Rome.    

In the case of the Christian Church beginning in the fourth century, to disagree with the doctrines affirmed by the Emperor Constantine, carried with it the sentence of death.   Thus, Edward Gibbon writes in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: ”Constantine easily believed that the heretics, who presumed to dispute his opinions or to oppose his commands, were guilty of the most absurd and criminal obstinacy... Not a moment was lost in excluding the ministers and teachers of the separated congregations from any share of the rewards and immunities which the emperor had so liberally bestowed on the orthodox clergy. But as the sectaries might still exist under the cloud of royal disgrace, the conquest of the East was immediately followed by an edict which announced their total destruction”.    Thus, in the same way that whoever did not embrace the religion of the emperor met with the sentence of death, whatever scriptures did not conform to the approved version, was immediately destroyed (see http://BibleCorruption.com ).  



The State Master Encyclopedia lists the original cause of action on religious grounds when I opposed the New York seat belt law in 2004, but New York never set a hearing on the issue.   Upon retiring to North Carolina, I was again ticketed -- even though I explained to the officer that I held a Constitutionally protected religious objection to the mandatory seat belt law which I oppose on the grounds that it is anti-biblical, anti-spiritual, and exists as an Atheist quasi-religious symbol that promotes a mindset and paradigm of thought that is founded upon abject ignorance of the Laws of God.   


In the initial trial before Judge James K. Roberson in Alamance County, the court was provided biblical citings, detailed scientific proofs, as well as testimony that demonstrated my Constitutionally protected position (see North Carolina Motion Papers).    Further evidence was submitted to the court that demonstrated that (1) the Spiritual Christians were hunted down and murdered in the fourth century because of their rejection of the  pagan religions dogma of the Roman Emperor Constantine (see The Corruption Of The Church); (2) that the original pre-Nicene Church was a purely Spiritual Religion that taught the believer a process founded upon  "...a religion of the spirit that expressed itself in the heightening and enlargement of human consciousness” (see Expansion Of Mind); (3) to the degree, that documentation was presented which demonstrates that the primary objective of the pre-Nicene Church was the spiritual maturation and enlightenment of the believers (see Religion As A System Of Education).   And that when Jesus taught that all his followers were to seek out and learn exclusively from the One Teacher (see Spiritual Intuitive Development) that reveals all truths to the mind of the sincere and faithful seeker, the wearing of a seatbelt to appease the fruit (Paradigm of Thought) of Atheism, is a rejection of Divine Providence and the direct Teachings and Revelations of the True Prophet -- all to appease and worship at the altar of  the  government ordained Atheist Paradigm of Thought. 


Further evidence was presented to demonstrate that while the spiritual essence of the Church was put to death in the fourth century, the dogmatic rulings by the Emperor Justinian in the 6th century cast the Church into the abyss of absolute ignorance with respect to the functional workings of the Laws which control every aspect of life in this world.   And because the faith-based Christians no longer possessed the necessary knowledge to understanding the movement of the Laws in the lives of mankind and all things (see The Spiritual Castration Of The Church), they became totally alienated from the true spiritual meaning of the Gospels.   Now, when the spiritual essence of the Gospel is once again in the process of being reborn, those who travail in TheWay find themselves confronted by the prevailing cultural Atheist Paradigm of Thought, and government officials who will impose UnConstitutional restrictions upon the people. 

Allan Cronshaw
aka Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus 

Why Does Man Ignore The Most Important Facts Of Reality?

When properly and factually understood, there is absolutely no difference between the findings of the enlightened scientist, the Apostle Paul, and the enlightened Mystic -- except, perhaps, the key word enlightened.   But the very word enlightened raises the crucial question as to how one even becomes enlightened?   With great wisdom and vision Einstein stated "Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible."    But since the vast majority of modern scientists reject even the existence of the invisible, it is the scientific community that has rendered itself impotent with respect to any real depth of perception and understanding.   Paul conveyed the exact same message to the congregation of believers that Einstein stated in the words:  "While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal" (2 Cor 4:18 KJV).

Both of these statements which are ignored by the vast majority of scientists and their religious counterparts, ignore the underlying reality that not only does the unseen dimension of what we see exist, but that it is within the scope of man's innate abilities to develop this facility of mind that enables the individual to perceive an unseen reality that is beyond the limits of man's undeveloped physical organic senses.   And with respect to the invisible, when it is understood that what is being made reference to is a blindness that encompasses all of mankind in a condition that Jesus portrayed as the "outer darkness" of mind and being (see Outer Darkness) -- which is parallel to the analogy of the illusions of Plato's Cave that has entrapped mankind in a world that he does not understand the nature and reality of -- and that when Jesus accused the Torah Observant leaders of the Jews of being blind guides who did not perceive or understand the true meaning of the scriptures (see An Inconvenient Truth) -- and as blind guides who Jesus condemned because they had thrown away the Key of Knowledge, they led the common people into the ditch by the side of TheWay -- then the reality of the Gospel Message must be understood as the means and process of enabling the disciple to overcome human organic limitations that shackle mankind to the abyss of ignorance.    Yet, while the Church continues to embrace Roman dogma that is openly condemned and rejected in the New Testament (see The Lie), the very spiritual essence of the Gospel teachings continues to be ignored.   Resulting in the fact that while Paul and the Gospel authors openly warn the readers of their inability to comprehend anything beyond the most basic of spiritual principles -- they remain blind to the higher reality of the soul and the Mysteries of the Kingdom (see Gospel Mysteries) -- and to their own demise, both the Church and their critics that claim to adhere to the findings of science, continue to ignore this ultra important universal message spoken equally to all of mankind by the voice of both the scientist and the mystic.    

Quoting from the subheading, The Ultimate Answers To Life - Science Proves Mysticism And Gnosticism:  Einstein experienced shock when he first came into contact with the new reality of atomic physics, and wrote in his autobiography: “All my attempts to adapt the theoretical foundation of physics to this [new type of] knowledge failed completely. It was as if the ground had been pulled out from under one, with no firm foundation to be seen anywhere, upon which one could have built”.   In the words of Einstein: “We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the field is extremely intense… There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality” (quoted in M. Capek, The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics).   Therefore, unless a researcher has the ability to access the field that is the source of what appears to the senses in what man perceives as concrete matter, then it will remain impossible for him to even begin to contemplate the true reality of what he thinks he sees or perceives.    And it is this inability of the organic senses or mind of man to access the causal Etheric Field, that is representative of the Great Void in his vision and understanding of all world events -- past, present, and the future.  

Yet, the vast majority of both the leaders in the scientific community, as well as the leaders of religion, continue to ignore these profound words that man's true reality is in the unseen -- i.e., the Etheric Field that generates the (allegorical) forms which we observe and interact with our organic (carnal) senses.   Further, not only does the vast majority of mankind continue to follow the blind guides of both junk-science and pseudo-religion, but we permit our children to be imbued and programmed with a mindset that insures the ultimate failure of the child.   To what degree have we permitted our children to be disenfranchised from their own higher soul-reality by ignoring the warnings of the most enlightened visionaries of mankind?  Quoting The Allusion Of The Forms Of Matter:   In his 1951 textbook on quantum theory, Bohm offered some interesting speculations on the analogies between quantum processes and thought processes, thus carrying further the celebrated statement made by the astronomer James Jeans two decades earlier: “Today there is a wide measure of agreement… that the stream of knowledge is heading towards a non-mechanical reality; the universe begins to look more like a great thought than like a great machine”; and the statement by astronomer Arthur Eddington:  “The stuff of the universe is mind-stuff”.   More recently, cyberneticist David Foster described “an intelligent universe” whose apparent concreteness is generated by cosmic data from an unknowable, organized source.   The reality of the holographic theory says that: “…our brains mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space.   The brain is a hologram, interpreting a holographic universe.”

What this means is that modern science has not only factually confirmed the warnings of the illusions of Plato's Cave, but have begun to discover the reality of the "outer darkness" that Jesus taught all of organic man dwells within.  If it is true that there is nothing but (cosmic) thought, and “…our brains mathematically construct hard reality by interpreting frequencies from a dimension transcending time and space" -- and what we see is in fact aspects of mind impressed into the (allegorical) forms of nature -- then our modern understanding of our own true higher reality is merely one rung above that of a Neanderthal cave man.   And man's destiny when he passes from this life can be portrayed as the ultimate shock and awe which results when each individual must come to terms with the higher reality which they closed their eyes to and ignored -- like an ostrich that hides its head in the sand.

While it has taken modern science to prove the vision of the mystic -- proven the reality portrayed in Plato's Cave and the "outer darkness" that Jesus taught about -- the exploration of man's unseen higher reality must be a consensual partnership between religion and science -- in that, the very purpose of religion and the Gospel teachings is to prove the higher reality that science now knows exists as the Source of not only our true self and higher being, but off all things in this world.   Thus, while the scientist has located the door to man's higher reality, it is the very spiritual core of the Gospel teachings that must utilize the Key of Knowledge in opening that door to the Truth and the Kingdom which man seeks. 

Totally unbeknown to the limited perception and understanding of mind of organic man, is the fact that his mind is segmented -- and there exists a barrier to the "outer darkness"  within himself that must be transcended -- and that once this barrier is overcome, man possesses the ability to see and understand all things for what they truly are.   What this means is that if we ceased to teach our children our cultural junk-science and institutional pseudo-religious dogma -- and focused instead on doing what Jesus commanded, and remove the beam from our own eyes, before attempting to remove the splinters from the eyes and understanding of others -- we would find ourselves walking the path of true enlightenment.   And when properly understood from this higher perspective, all of man's efforts and endeavors are doomed to failure, so long as he ignores this One Path that he must himself walk that reveals all the answers to life that he seeks.

Once again, turning to the wisdom of Einstein: "The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."   And when man's higher reality that lies beyond the other side of the inner barrier is understood, no truer words were spoken from any prophet or mystic known to mankind since the very dawn of time itself.   And thus the proverbial question that men of vision have struggled with since he set foot upon the earth, is the reality that if there indeed exists a greater source of knowledge and consciousness within man, then those who attempt to teach the child by programming their thinking, inflict a greater harm upon the person as they alienate the child from this inner Source.   And in this respect, unbeknown to the modern believer is the fact that Jesus condemned seeking out the teachers and authorities of this world -- and the essence of the original Gospel message was to open the inner "narrow strait gate" so as to gain access to the Kingdom that lies beyond the limitations of the barrier, and learn all Truths directly from the One Teacher that Jesus commanded to seek out (see The True Prophet).

In a total rejection of what Jesus actually taught and the original Gospel portrayed, mankind continues to embrace institutional learning that suppresses the sacred gift of the intuitive self -- promotes institutional religion that condemns the gift of the intuitive self as heresy -- and to his own detriment, modern man has permitted himself to become immersed in a politically correct culture that exists in denial of the very gift that has been bestowed upon mankind that enables him to escape the illusions and suffering of this world.   And when rightly understood, mankind of his own volition chooses the path of ignorance -- immersing himself in the cycles of suffering and utter despair are perpetuated from generation to generation, as mankind continues to aimlessly wander as a virtual slave to his own ignorance.    And when this reality is understood for what it truly is, only then is the words of the recently discovered Gospel of Thomas comprehended where it is written: (5) Jesus said, "Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you ..."    And while only a handful of people have evolved their intuitive centers of mind sufficiently enough to perceive and understand from the higher reality of an enlightened mind, this potential of man that is portrayed as a gift, is indeed the long ignored wisdom expressed by both Einstein, the Apostle Paul, and the biblical authors.

Brother of Yeshua/Jesus

Is Marriage Lost? Or Was It Thrown Away By The Church

While I am in total agreement with Josh Craddock's WorldNetDaily article entitled Have Conservatives Lost Same-Sex Marriage Debate? where he states that 65 to 70% of young people see no problem with same sex marriage, the problem is that the Church has literally thrown marriage under the bus -- so to speak.   Why would I make such a profound statement?   After all, it is easily demonstrated that the Church's concept of marriage has been preached from pulpits to the flock of faith-based believers throughout the present cultural transformation that has brought same-sex marriage into the forefront of issues that have been set before both the people and the Courts.   But in throwing away what Jesus portrayed as the Key of Knowledge -- and in failing to seek out the spiritual meaning of the scriptures (see An Inconvenient Truth) -- the young intellectuals who are seeking the answers to their many questions, have been turned away from the essence of the knowledge they seek by the very Church that should be the source of higher knowledge.

An astute Bible student knows that there are countless verses that confirm the position that nothing in this world transpires apart from the Will of God.   And yet, because they have lost their way, the Church hides from this well defined biblical reality in the manner of an ostrich who hides his head in the sand.   Thus, in the issue of same-sex marriage the question that God has presented to the Church is this: Does the faithful flock continue to cling to their blind leaders who have been conquered by their self-imposed ignorance, in order to remain cloaked in a death-shroud of man-made dogma?   And thus, should a person of faith seek to have their mind opened to the higher mysteries of the spirit?   And when this higher knowledge is received, should they not only live in accord with this higher truth -- but also, teach the means of acquiring this truth to their children?   Every day Christians beseech the Lord to bestow upon them a higher understanding of the Gospel -- and when the Lord attempts to answer their prayers, they perpetually reject whatever does not conform to their man-made dogma.   Thus, they have bound themselves within the circle of self-imposed ignorance.

Only a person who lacks the ability to read, is unaware that marriage is a divinely ordained covenant -- to the degree that even looking upon a person who is not your spouse is portrayed as adulterous.  And in the same way that Jesus taught that he who has been given much, the greater will be required -- the fact that Christians don't at all understand why Jesus even made such a warning, means that they are responsible for the immorality of our present culture.   Statistics demonstrate that large numbers of Evangelical Christians are addicted to pornography.   The children of Evangelical Christians see no reason not to hook up in recreational sex.   Yet, there was an important reason not understood by modern Christians as to why Jesus warned that if a man so much as looks upon a woman who is not his wife with lust, that such a man is an adulterer who has been turned out of TheWay.    Moreover, there is an important reason why Paul proclaims that sex with a harlot is a sin against the Temple of God (1 Cor 6:15-20).   There is an important reason why Paul warns that a genuine Christian must not keep company, or even sit at the same table and dine with one who is sexually immoral (1 Cor 5:9-13).   Yet, our sons and daughters are being programmed with the thinking of the most immoral people to walk the face of the earth in our government run institutional schools (see Public Schoolers - How's That Indoctrination Working Out For You?).   If you claim to have faith in the Gospel teachings and the Bible, then why are these teachings totally ignored by the modern Church?   Which has turned a blind eye not only to what the scriptures define as immoral acts, but also the knowledge of why these acts are forbidden in the Gospel.   And that the very Hand of God has raised up and confronted the Church with its own folly and unbelief, is the reason why same-sex marriage has come to pass.

The first mistake of man was when he permitted government to define the spiritual limitations of religion to that of blind faith, meaningless rituals and approved church dogma.   The second mistake was when the Church permitted Caesar to define the Sacred Covenant of Marriage from a purely secular perspective -- where government approved civil hook-ups were ordained as the Sacred Sacrament where the two are transformed into "one flesh".    And from this perspective, the very first Act of the Apostles was the formation of Spiritual Communities -- set apart from the people of this world -- because the essence of the Divine Marriage is the very environment in which the Gospel was intended to be matured and manifest.   And with respect to the Divine Marriage: Faith-based is that condition where the believer keeps the teachings and commandments based upon their faith during that period of their lives that they still lack the spiritual knowledge to understand the reasons why God has Commanded these teachings to be faithfully observed and lived out.   If the alleged believer does not observe and carry out the teachings and commandments associated with their faith, then they are pseudo-believers who only call upon the Name of the Lord with their lips -- while their heart is far from Him.    So if I say to the faith-based believer that if you actually do and live the Commandments and teachings that you will be able to enter the Kingdom and be "taught by God" (John 6:45) -- directly, and in the Presence of the Lord (see The One Teacher/True Prophet) -- then if I attempt to convey to you why God instituted these Commandments -- and why they are imperative to carry out with your wife and husband and children -- why do you condemn the messenger as a heretic for being "taught by God" ?  Or, in the words of Paul: "Have I now become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" (Gal 4:16).

That the Divine Marriage is the spiritually ordained environment that is necessary to bring about the intended objectives of the Gospel Teachings and the next stages of birth, is a reality that the Church has thrown away -- thereby casting the congregation of faith-based believers into a Spiritual Diaspora of Profound Ignorance.   That the Hebrew meaning of Genesis 2:19 where it is written:  "I will make for him a helpmate opposite him..."  -- and that this opposite has a much higher purpose than the propagation of the species, and is not at all understood today -- is the very reason why the Hand of God has raised up the issue of same-sex civil marriage, in order to convict the Christians who call upon the Lord with their lips, while their hearts remain far from the teachings of the Gospel.

It never dawns upon the modern believe that physical conception and birth is merely the pattern for a higher spiritual reality that is nourished by the environment of the Divine Marriage.    And that sex has a higher purpose than the propagation of the species -- and that this higher reality of sex is the reason why Paul commands not to even keep company with one who is sexually immoral.   And in the same way that Dr. Luan Brizendine stated in her book, The Female Mind, that    "There is no unisex brain. Girls arrive already wired as girls, and boys arrive already wired as boys. Their brains are different by the time they're born, and their brains are what drive their impulses, values and their very reality..."  -- it never even dawns upon the modern believer that male and female is in fact half of the whole -- that they are opposite because of the polarity of the impressions they generate -- and that within the sanctified environment of the Divine Marriage these impressions are a type of food that nourishes the spiritual embryo on a higher level in its development to bring about the next stage of birth (see Impressions As Food) -- and that the Hand of God has raised up the homosexual and the issue of same-sex civil marriage in judgment of the Church which has totally lost its way -- in much the same way that the Hand of God raised up the Babylonians to bring the Jews into captivity, and the Romans to destroy the Jerusalem Temple.   Because the Christians refuse to live in accord with the Gospel teachings, their children promote same-sex civil marriages, and they too have been cast into the abyss of spiritual ignorance.

Paul warns the congregation of faith-based believers: "See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world..." (Col 2:8 NIV)  -- and in total defiance of these words, pseudo-Christians send their children to government schools which program their impressionable young minds with the hedonist immorality of this world.   Ignoring the fact that every tenet of modern day Church dogma is rejected in the New Testament (see The Lie), the Church continues to promote what they know is wrong, in spite of the Gospel teachings.

This reply is also in response to the article by David Kupelian entitled Open Letter To Conservatives Who Back Same-Sex Marriages --  and Don Feder who authored the article If Marriage Is Lost, We Lose Everything.   A person of faith does not have to be ignorant of the Mysteries of the Kingdom of God (see Mysteries of the Gospel).   And as an enlightened and faithful servant of the Most High, my own articles are never even considered by such publications as WorldNetDaily, because I am too liberal to be conservative -- too conservative to be liberal -- to enlightened to embrace the man made dogma of the Church -- too spiritual to be of this world -- and too spiritually mature to be viewed as an authority -- and as a voice of Enlightened Reason, I am a shepherd of TheWay who conveys what most people are fearful to even hear.

Brother Of Yeshua/Jesus